| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|

|


Microbiological
activity is a related factor in a majority of pipe corrosion problems found
today. Given that it is present in most circulating systems to some degree, and
even in drinking water, the possible role of microbiologically influenced
corrosion (MIC) should always be considered in any corrosion investigation.
Proper identification and quantification of an MIC condition is critical since
different forms will demand very different methods for treatment and
correction.
Evidence that an MIC condition
might exist includes:
- High steel
corrosion rates exceeding 10 mils per year (MPY)
- Extreme pitting
activity
- Extremely
premature pipe failure
- Tubercular
deposits
- High
microbiological plate counts
- Foul smelling
or hydrogen sulfide smelling deposits
- Pinhole
leaks
- Growths in the
cooling tower basin, or pans
- Thick black
muddy deposits
- Microbiological
growths or slimes on the tower fill, condenser tubes, corrosion coupons, or any
interior piping surface
Though most often
found at carbon steel pipe and in open condenser water systems, MIC has also
been shown to cause severe deterioration to copper and galvanized steel
domestic water pipe. See Technical Bulletin
# C-5 about microbiologically influenced
corrosion.
The potential for
MIC is always suggested by high colony counts at a typical dip slide test.
Metallurgical testing, however, usually offers the first solid evidence of an
MIC problem by exposing the distinctive profile of the corroded pit area caused
by specific microbiological organisms. A follow-up chemical analysis of the pit
area for the metabolic by-products of such microorganisms will provide further
evidence that MIC exists. The presence of sulfuric acid or sulfur based
compounds, for example, would strongly suggest an MIC condition since it is a
common by-product of MIC related sulfur reducing bacteria.
Providing absolute proof of a biological
condition, however, often requires additional steps in follow-up to
metallurgical testing. Two additional methods for positively identifying the
presence of MIC related microorganisms are:

The first method
involves incubating, in a qualified lab, samples of the suspected
microorganisms on culture plates having the necessary energy source, nutrients,
pH, and temperature. If present, and if in viable form, the microorganisms will
grow and reproduce to yield visible colonies having very specific, shape,
color, and texture - and which are reactive to specific indicating tests and
identification procedures. Mixed colonies of microorganisms generally require
further culturing in order to make an
identification.
Microbiological plate
cultures are incubated for as long as 1-2 weeks, after which a report of colony
forming units (CFU), or an estimate of cell quantity, can be established. This
culture method of cell identification provides a low cost means to not only
identify specific microorganisms, but to estimate their quantity, or level of
infection, within the piping system.
Providing
representative and viable samples for testing is as important as the laboratory
testing method itself. Anaerobic microorganisms, those which cannot live in the
presence of air or oxygen, and which are common to many MIC conditions, are
especially difficult to properly sample and save. All suspected microbiological
samples should be taken immediately prior to pick-up by the lab facility or
shipped via next day service. Samples should also remain wet at all times, and
should be collected into a sterile container whenever possible.

Plate culture
identification may not always provide the information necessary to identify a
suspected MIC problem. This may be due to an insufficient sample, due to old,
dried, or otherwise dead and non-viable organic material, or to the inability
to conclusively identify suspected organisms. In such cases, or where a greater
and more finite degree of information is desired, advanced DNA identification
is available.
Under this method, microbial
DNA is directly isolated from the sample - which gives a more accurate
representation of the microbial population of the sample without the bias of
slower growing microorganisms not being represented. In addition, injured
cells, which may not be able to grow on standard cell culture media, will also
be detected.
Such calculated colony
forming units based upon DNA will be higher than at cultured colony forming
units because of the inclusion of recently killed or dead cells, as well as
cells that may not grow due to injury or failure of the media to provide
favorable conditions for growth.
Varying
levels of DNA analysis exist:
|

|
|
This "quick look" provides a breakdown of microbial DNA
present for the three basic groups of bacteria, fungi, and algae. Bacterial DNA
is then further broken down according to whether it is gram negative or gram
positive.

|
|

|
|
This investigation reports the percentage of bacterial DNA
found in the sample sediment and the percentage of each bacterial genus
identified from a library of 21 bacterial genus-specific probes. In addition,
colony forming units are calculated for each bacterial genus
detected.
The calculated CFU value is based on the amount of 1.6
fentagrams/bacterial cell. Such calculated CFU's will be higher than cultured
CFU's because of inclusion of recently killed or dead cells as well as cells
that may not grow due to injury or failure of the media to provide favorable
conditions for growth.

|
|

|
|
There are times when only information
concerning a particular bacterial type is required without doing a full DNA
analysis. In such cases, a calculated colony forming unit (CFU) of the genus
detected is given.
Again, the calculated CFU value is based on the
amount of 1.6 fentagrams/bacterial cell. Such calculated CFU's will be higher
than cultured CFU's because of inclusion of recently killed or dead cells as
well as cells that may not grow due to injury or failure of the media to
provide favorable conditions for growth.
General categories of
microorganisms tested for include: Slime formers, iron bacteria, sulfate
reducers, and sulfuric acid producers. |

Often the second
or third step in the evaluation of a pipe corrosion problem, DNA and cell
culture testing offers the final proof most property managers require before
committing to a long and likely expensive remedial effort. Thorough knowledge
of the problem is also critical to the water treatment contractor in order that
they can evaluate and choose the best chemical cleaning
option.
DNA testing is especially helpful
where live cell samples cannot be provided, or where the interest to test for
MIC is an after thought based upon a dried and stale pipe or deposit sample.
DNA offers one additional option toward ensuring that the steps taken in any
pipe cleaning or remedial effort are the rights ones, and that they will be
effective.
©
Copyright
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|